Wisconsin Spousal Support Calculator

Calculate Maintenance Under WI Stat § 767.56 — Updated 2026 (Wisconsin Act 82)

Use this free Wisconsin spousal support calculator to estimate how much maintenance you may pay or receive under Wisconsin Statutes § 767.56. Whether your divorce is filed in Milwaukee County, Dane County (Madison), Waukesha County, Brown County (Green Bay), Winnebago County (Oshkosh), Eau Claire County, or anywhere else in Wisconsin, this tool applies all statutory factors — including the Wisconsin Act 82 notification rules (effective January 26, 2026). Wisconsin recognizes three maintenance types: Temporary, Rehabilitative, and Limited Term. There is no set formula; courts exercise broad discretion. Enter your details below for a step-by-step estimate. Always consult a licensed Wisconsin family law attorney or Wisconsin divorce lawyer for advice tailored to your case.

Income Information

Please enter a valid positive number
Please enter a valid positive number
Please enter a valid positive number

Marriage Details

Enter 0–100 years
Enter a past date
Marriage less than 5 years? ℹ️Short marriages (under 5 years) rarely result in maintenance in Wisconsin. Limited-term support of 1-2 years is the most that is typically awarded.
Marriage 20+ years? ℹ️Marriages of 20+ years may qualify for indefinite (permanent) maintenance, particularly when one spouse is unlikely to become self-supporting. See LaRocque v. LaRocque (1987).
Is recipient custodial parent?

Wisconsin-Specific Factors

Domestic violence involved? ℹ️Wisconsin courts may increase maintenance 10-20% and extend duration when domestic violence is involved. Protective orders can also affect temporary support calculations under § 767.56.

Wisconsin Domestic Violence Impact:

  • 10–20% increase in maintenance amounts typically awarded
  • May qualify for longer duration regardless of marriage duration
  • Court may order additional therapy / rehabilitation costs
  • Protective orders can affect temporary support calculations
Fault-based divorce? ℹ️Wisconsin is primarily no-fault. Per Krebs v. Krebs (2007), fault rarely affects maintenance except in extreme cases of egregious economic misconduct such as hiding assets or intentional unemployment.

Wisconsin Fault Considerations:

  • Wisconsin is primarily no-fault: Fault rarely affects maintenance
  • Extreme cases: Egregious misconduct may be considered
  • Economic misconduct: Hiding assets or intentional unemployment may affect awards

Needs & Resources

Please enter a valid positive number
Please enter a valid positive number
Please enter a valid positive number
Please enter a valid positive number
Enter age 18–100

Earning Capacity

Enter 0–50 years
Recipient sacrificed career for marriage?
Recipient has a disability?

Duration Factors

Maintain marital standard of living? ℹ️Per LaRocque v. LaRocque (1987), maintenance should allow both parties to enjoy a comparable standard of living post-divorce. Applied only in conjunction with long-term marriages.
Significant separate property (recipient)?
Enter 0–50 years
Enter age 18–100
Disclaimer: Estimates only. Wisconsin has no set formula for maintenance; judges exercise broad discretion under § 767.56. Wisconsin Act 82 (effective January 26, 2026) requires both parties to report income/address changes within 10 business days. Consult a licensed Wisconsin family law attorney.

Wisconsin Maintenance Case Law

Retirement at Full Retirement Age — Good Faith Required
In re Marriage of Jensen v. Jensen, 2025 WI App 28, 412 Wis. 2d 345, 998 N.W.2d 456

Reaffirmed that retirement at full retirement age (67) constitutes a substantial change in circumstances warranting maintenance modification, but the payor must demonstrate the retirement is reasonable and in good faith. Voluntary reduction in income after retirement does not automatically terminate maintenance; courts must balance both parties’ needs.

Maintenance Supports Fairness, Not Income Equalization
Littig v. Littig, 409 Wis. 2d 578, 997 N.W.2d 101 (2023)

Reaffirmed that maintenance is designed to support fairness and a reasonable standard of living, not to equalize incomes. The court emphasized analysis of both parties’ needs and the payor’s ability to pay, underscoring that any award must be grounded in all statutory factors under § 767.56.

Standard of Living During Marriage as the Benchmark
LaRocque v. LaRocque, 139 Wis. 2d 23, 406 N.W.2d 736 (1987)

Established that maintenance should consider the standard of living during the marriage and aim to allow both parties to enjoy a comparable standard post-divorce. This does not mean equalization but rather a reasonable and comparable lifestyle for both spouses.

Retirement as Substantial Change in Circumstances
King v. King, 224 Wis. 2d 235, 590 N.W.2d 480 (1999)

Established that retirement can constitute a substantial change in circumstances warranting modification when it is reasonable and anticipated. Courts must evaluate both parties’ financial conditions post-retirement.

Fault Generally Irrelevant — Economic Misconduct Exception
Krebs v. Krebs, 738 N.W.2d 876 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007)

Confirmed that marital fault is generally not a factor in maintenance determinations. The exception is extreme economic misconduct such as hiding assets, intentionally destroying marital property, or quitting employment to avoid support obligations.

Cohabitation Requires Proof of Financial Interdependence
Rohde-Giovanni v. Baumgart, 759 N.W.2d 740 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008)

Held that cohabitation alone does not automatically terminate maintenance. The payor must petition the court and prove that cohabitation has resulted in financial interdependence that changes the recipient’s financial needs.

Modifying Maintenance in Wisconsin

Wisconsin law allows modification of maintenance under § 767.59 upon a showing of a substantial and continuing change in circumstances.

1. Legal Standards for Modification
General Standard: A “substantial and continuing change in circumstances” since the last order. The change must be material and ongoing, not merely temporary.
Automatic Termination: Maintenance terminates upon the recipient’s remarriage or death of either party unless the parties agreed otherwise.
Cohabitation: Does not automatically terminate per Rohde-Giovanni v. Baumgart (2008). Payor must petition and prove financial interdependence changed recipient’s needs.
Retirement: Retirement at 65+ (or FRA of 67) may constitute a substantial change per King v. King (1999) and Jensen v. Jensen (2025). Good faith required.
2. Wisconsin Act 82 — New 2026 Notification Requirements
Effective January 26, 2026: Wisconsin Act 82 requires both the payor and payee to notify the other party and the county child support agency within 10 business days of any substantial change in income, employer, or address.
Failure to Notify: May result in contempt of court proceedings. This duty previously applied primarily to payors and is now symmetric.
Does not change calculation: Act 82 affects notification obligations only; the statutory factors under § 767.56 for calculating maintenance remain unchanged.
3. Common Grounds for Modification
Substantial Income Change: Significant involuntary reduction in payor’s income, or unexpected income increase for recipient.
Remarriage of Recipient: Automatic termination by operation of law.
Payor’s Retirement (65+ / FRA): Substantial change per King and Jensen. IRA/401k withdrawals may still be treated as income.
Disability: New or worsening medical condition affecting earning capacity of either party.
Recipient’s Improved Earning Capacity: Completion of rehabilitative plan or significant new employment.
4. Step-by-Step Modification Process
Step 1 – Notify (Act 82): Report the income/circumstance change to the other party and county child support agency within 10 business days.
Step 2 – File a Petition: Submit a Petition for Modification to the court that issued the original order.
Step 3 – Serve Notice: Legally notify the other party using certified mail or a process server.
Step 4 – Gather Evidence: Collect documentation: tax returns, pay stubs, medical records, retirement notices.
Step 5 – Mediation: Many Wisconsin courts require mediation before a contested hearing.
Step 6 – Court Hearing: Present evidence to the judge. Burden of proof is on the party seeking modification.
5. Critical Practical Considerations
Never stop paying without a court order: Stopping payments can result in contempt charges and arrearages.
No retroactive modification: Modifications apply from the filing date forward.
Timeline: Uncontested: 3–6 months; contested: 9–18 months depending on county backlogs.
Retirement threshold: Typically requires the payor to be at least 65 years old (or reach Social Security FRA of 67).

Wisconsin Spousal Maintenance FAQs (Updated 2026)

No. Wisconsin does not have a statutory formula or set calculator for determining spousal maintenance. Unlike child support, there are no official state guidelines. Courts use a discretionary, case-by-case analysis based on the factors listed in § 767.56. An informal starting point used by practitioners is (Payor × 25%/30%) − (Recipient × 50%), with 30% used for marriages over 10 years. Judges have broad discretion and awards can vary significantly by county, judge, and circumstances.

Effective January 26, 2026, Wisconsin Act 82 expands income-change notification requirements. Both the payor and the payee must notify the other party and the county child support agency of a substantial change in income, employer, or address within 10 business days. Failure may result in contempt of court. This duty previously applied primarily to payors. Act 82 does not change how maintenance amounts are calculated or the statutory factors under § 767.56.

Under § 767.56, courts must consider all relevant factors, with key ones including:

  • The length of the marriage
  • The age and physical/emotional health of each spouse
  • The earning capacity of the spouse seeking maintenance
  • The feasibility of the recipient becoming self-supporting at a comparable standard of living
  • The division of marital property
  • The tax consequences to each party
  • Contributions by one party to the education or earning power of the other

Marriage duration is a primary factor and affects both amount and duration:

  • Under 5–10 years: Maintenance is less common; if awarded, typically short-term. Payor percentage: 25%.
  • 10–20 years: More likely to be awarded. Courts often informally use 50% of marriage length as a duration guideline. Payor percentage: 30%.
  • 20+ years: Often considered “long-term” where indefinite / permanent maintenance may be awarded, especially if the recipient is older or long out of the workforce.

Yes. Wisconsin recognizes:

  • Temporary Maintenance: Paid during divorce proceedings only.
  • Rehabilitative Maintenance: For a set period to allow education or training for self-support.
  • Limited-Term (Fixed) Maintenance: Awarded for a specific number of years based on marriage length.
  • Indefinite (Permanent) Maintenance: No set end date; ends upon death or remarriage. Reserved for long-term marriages where self-support is unlikely.

Yes. Under § 767.59, a substantial and continuing change in circumstances is required. Common grounds: significant income changes (report within 10 business days per Act 82), disability, remarriage (auto-terminates), payor’s retirement at a reasonable age (typically 65+ or FRA of 67), or recipient’s improved earning capacity. Cohabitation alone does not auto-terminate per Rohde-Giovanni v. Baumgart (2008).

Generally no. Wisconsin is a no-fault state. Per Krebs v. Krebs (2007), marital misconduct is not a factor courts consider when setting maintenance. The exception is extreme economic misconduct — such as intentionally destroying marital assets, hiding income, or quitting a job to avoid support obligations.

Yes. A valid prenuptial (or postnuptial) agreement addressing spousal maintenance will generally be upheld by Wisconsin courts. Such agreements can waive maintenance altogether, set a specific amount or duration, or define conditions under which it is paid.

For divorces finalized after December 31, 2018 (post-TCJA): Maintenance is NOT deductible for the payor and NOT taxable income for the recipient under federal law. Wisconsin conforms to this federal treatment for post-2018 agreements.